The mid-July press release from Britain’s Department of Energy &
Climate Change announcing the launch of long awaited feed-in tariffs for
residential heating system was fairly straightforward. The press
release explained what the tariffs were for, how much would be paid, and
for how long.
Yet for North Americans, the understated press release was significant on several grounds.
First, the announcement was made by Greg Barker, Minister
of State at the Department of Energy & Climate Change (DECC) and a
Conservative MP. That Barker is a Conservative MP in a Conservative
government would alone be noteworthy in both a U.S. and Canadian
political context where renewable energy policy is so polarized that
it’s nearly unthinkable a national conservative figure would issue such a
statement.
Second, the announcement described a precedent-setting application of feed-in tariffs to home heating — the world’s first. Moreover, the program includes the heat generated by solar thermal (hot-water) systems.
Britain has pioneered feed-in tariffs for heat and has
been successfully using FITs for commercial heating since the fall of
2011. See New British and Malaysian FIT Programs Launch.
This contrasts markedly with Ontario, Canada where the
province stubbornly refused to adapt its popular Feed-in Tariff program
to pay for commercial and residential heat, arguing that it would be
“too complex” to do so.
Elsewhere in North America, where old Imperial measures,
such as British Thermal Units (Btu), still dominate the discussion of
heat, policymakers can’t imagine how one would even go about setting
feed-in tariffs for heat. After all, heat is not electricity and is not
sold in kilowatt-hours in the US.
Nevertheless, the British didn’t find the challenges insurmountable.
But what was most striking in the press release was a long
list of documents that form the public record of the process used to
determine the tariffs, including the spreadsheet used to calculate the
tariffs: Spreadsheet with calculations used to derive tariffs for the Domestic RHI Scheme.
To the casual observer finding a public-domain spreadsheet
may seem insignificant. It’s not, however. While tariff setting is a
political act, it is also a technical one based on various assumptions
and calculations of what price is needed to be both fair and effective.
Thus, spreadsheets are the tool policymakers use to determine a tariff —
or justify a tariff they’ve chose for political reasons.
DECC’s multi-tab, 1.3 mb spreadsheet is in a downloadable
format and includes investment cost and heat generation assumptions used
to calculate Renewable Heat Incentives for residential use. And in a
further effort at transparency, DECC’s spreadsheet includes a full
explanation of how each column of data was used to arrive at the
proposed tariffs.
Again, this contrasts with most regulatory proceedings in
North America where parties to the quasi-legal process must often sign
Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs), effectively applying “Top Secret”
stamps to discussions in the economic and public policy arena.
Ontario, for example, has consistently refused to divulge
the spreadsheet used to calculate the province’s feed-in tariffs without
more than a cursory explanation that the calculations are “proprietary”
That is, they are a “trade secret”. This is particularly odd in light
of DECC's actions in Britain. Ontario’s parliamentary and regulatory
system follows British practice and both Canada and Britain share the
same Queen as the head of state. Despite this, Ontario finds
calculations of publicly administered feed-in tariffs secret while
Britain does not.
It need not always be so. Nova Scotia, another Canadian
province, posts the spreadsheets its consultant uses to calculate the
province’s Community Feed-in Tariffs (ComFITs) and its upcoming Tidal
feed-in tariffs.
Britain’s feed-in tariffs for residential heat are
precedent-setting not only for what they are, but also for the
transparent manner in which they were derived.
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/08/britain-publishes-spreadsheet-used-to-calculate-precedent-setting-home-heat-tariffs
No comments:
Post a Comment