By
The recent projections for future energy consumption from Exxon
Mobil’s report, “Outlook for Energy,” and the EIA’s “Annual Energy Outlook, 2013” essentially said the same thing concerning the potential for natural gas and its derivative methanol: Natural gas use now is only about 1 percent of the total fuel used in vehicles, and by 2040, it will only rise to 4 percent.
This increase will take place in the trucking sector and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Owners of automobiles will not rush to natural gas, because of a lack of pumping stations and the low density of natural gas. Adam Sieminski, EIA administrator, said, “what really holds natural gas back is the infrastructure to refuel and how much energy you can put into a vehicle is limited.”
The recent projections for future energy consumption from Exxon
Mobil’s report, “Outlook for Energy,” and the EIA’s “Annual Energy Outlook, 2013” essentially said the same thing concerning the potential for natural gas and its derivative methanol: Natural gas use now is only about 1 percent of the total fuel used in vehicles, and by 2040, it will only rise to 4 percent.
This increase will take place in the trucking sector and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Owners of automobiles will not rush to natural gas, because of a lack of pumping stations and the low density of natural gas. Adam Sieminski, EIA administrator, said, “what really holds natural gas back is the infrastructure to refuel and how much energy you can put into a vehicle is limited.”
However, both
reports appear to underestimate the future demand for natural gas and
methanol. For example, Exxon Mobil’s study does not reveal its
assumptions concerning the price of gasoline versus natural gas. Both
Exxon Mobil and EIA suggest that gasoline prices will peak in the next
decade and begin to decline because of energy efficiency, CAFE standards
and the increased use of alternative fuels, particularly powered by
electricity. Neither explores in depth the impact of price differentials
on efficiency. Yes, gasoline is denser and gets more miles per gallon
gasoline equivalent (MPGe). But technology has reduced the differential
and the price of gasoline remains comparatively high, which permits
differences concerning density to be minimized considerably. Therefore,
natural gas and its derivative methanol are likely to remain cheaper
than gasoline and attract many cost conscious consumers.Furthermore,
neither report discusses the impact on the demand for natural gas and
methanol should Congress decide to develop policies and legislation to
curb GHG emissions from cars and trucks. Such actions would favor
natural gas and methanol-fueled automobiles over gasoline-powered ones.
What’s
your take on these projections for natural gas demand? What barriers
are preventing the ratio of natural gas in the transportation fuel mix
from increasing in our future energy needs?
Find the rest of Marshall Kaplan’s original post on his blog, Over A Barrel, at the Fuel Freedom Foundation.
http://theenergycollective.com/billsquadron/169971/future-energy-consumption-natural-gas--transportation
No comments:
Post a Comment