The lowest cost unit of energy is one that is not used
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/01/energy-efficiency-geothermal-heat-pumps-and-negawatts
A recent study by Ceres — "Practicing Risk-Aware Electricity
Regulation: What Every State Regulator Needs to Know" — concluded that
the least cost and least risk for future energy resources is energy
efficiency. Indeed, the lowest cost unit of energy is one that is not
used.
U.S. Buildings are Energy Gluttons
According to the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE), buildings are the largest single sector of total U.S. energy
consumption. Indeed, the buildings sector accounted for a whopping 41%
of primary energy use in 2010. The buildings sector consumes
about one third more energy than either the industrial or the
transportation sectors. And since 60% of energy used in buildings is for
“thermal loads,” some 24% of all energy used in the nation is for space heating, cooling and water heating.
A unique renewable energy technology with vast potential
for energy efficiency and savings stands ready to assist architects,
engineers, developers, builders, facilities managers and homeowners
dramatically reduce the thermal energy demands of buildings. That
technology is the ground-source—or geothermal—heat pump (GHP).
High Efficiency GHPs Slash Energy Use
GHPs are today’s most efficient, “green” alternative to
traditional heating and air conditioning equipment, offering significant
environmental, economic and societal benefits. Using a concept called
“geothermal exchange,” they tap the clean energy of the sun naturally
stored in the near-surface of the earth, transferring this free heat to
buildings in winter and back to the ground in summer.
They work by circulating water through a closed loop of
durable, high-density polyethylene pipe installed either horizontally or
vertically in the ground beside or even beneath a building. During the
winter, GHPs transfer heat energy from the ground to buildings for
warmth. In the summer, they provide cooling by rejecting unwanted heat
from buildings back to the earth, while providing free hot water. This
simple renewable energy concept has profound energy efficiency, cost and
environmental implications.
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), “Geothermal heat pumps are among the most efficient and
comfortable heating and cooling technologies currently available….,” and
EPA’s Energy Star program website says that, “…qualified geothermal heat pumps are over 45 percent more energy efficient than standard options.”
EPA says
that GHPs can reduce energy consumption — and corresponding emissions —
up to 44% compared with conventional air-source heat pumps, and up to
72% compared with electric resistance heating with standard
air-conditioning equipment. Recent advancements in GHP efficiencies only
buttress these facts.
More importantly, says DOE,
“The biggest benefit of GHPs is that they use 25% to 50% less
electricity than conventional heating or cooling systems. This
translates into a GHP using one unit of electricity to move three units
of heat from the earth.” So while a standard electric heater or natural
gas-fired combustion furnace can provide no more than 100% of the
energy it uses, GHPs in heating mode can offer efficiencies of 400%
percent and even more.
In cooling mode, GHPs have significantly higher energy
efficiency ratings than competing air-source heat pump systems. A recent
working paper by Western Farmers Electric Cooperative (Anadarko, OK)
describes dramatic drops in efficiency for air-source heat pumps
struggling in air temperatures exceeding 95° F on hot summer days. By
comparison, efficiency degradation of GHPs under the same conditions is
negligible.
GHPs Produce “Negawatts”
A typical 3-ton residential GHP can reduce summer peak
electricity demand by approximately two kilowatts (kW). Take that times
500 homes equipped with GHPS, and you have a peak power demand reduction
of a megawatt. That’s a megawatt of electricity NOT used, which creates
what energy experts around the world have called a “Negawatt” since
famed environmentalist and Rocky Mountain Institute founder Amory Lovins
coined the term over two decades ago.
The idea of a Negawatt is cutting electricity consumption
without necessarily reducing energy usage through energy efficiency. And
given their efficiencies, one of the best ways to get there is to
promote and install more GHPs across electrical power service
territories.
Lovins said it best:
“There isn't any demand for electricity for its own sake. What people
want is the services it provides.… Nonetheless, most of our utilities
have gotten into the habit of thinking they're in the kilowatt-hour
business, so they should sell more.… For some reason, it's hard for them
to get used to the idea that it's perfectly all right to sell less
electricity, and so bring in less revenue, as long as costs go down more
than revenues do.”
Electric Utilities Should Embrace GHPs
GHPs produce Negawatts, which have a higher value than any
megawatt of costly power generation. Because of their technology, GHPs
produce the thermal equivalent of a Negawatt at a fraction of
installation cost compared to a megawatt of electricity produced by any
renewable power source like wind, solar and biomass. And that doesn’t
consider the fact that GHPs avoid the need for expensive transmission
lines required by power plants, whether they be renewable, fossil- or
nuclear-powered.
By providing essentially free renewable energy from the
earth, GHPs can work wonders in lightening the load on our oft-strained
electrical grid. This is especially true for those sweltering days with
looming blackouts when consumer demand soars for air conditioning and
power generation is maxed out. For electric utilities, geothermal
heating and cooling reduces summer peak demand and actually builds load
(and power sales) in the winter—while providing comfort levels that
foster happy customers.
Another benefit of GHPs is carbon emission reduction. This
is an especially important policy consideration as concerns grow about
climate change caused by burning fossil fuels to produce electricity.
According to Oak Ridge National Laboratory, one ton of GHP capacity over
a 20-year operating cycle avoids CO2 emissions
of 21 metric tonnes. A thousand homes would therefore reduce carbon
emis-sions by 63,000 metric tonnes over a 20-year period.
Renewable Energy Policy Should Promote GHPs
Thirty states and the District of Columbia have enforceable Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards
(REPS) that mandate a certain minimum share of electricity offered by
utilities come from specified renewable resources. To date, only two of
those states include the thermal load avoided by GHPs as renewable. All
the others have definitions of “renewable” that state “energy
generated” and exclude the term “thermal load avoided.”
States with REPS need to recognize the value of Negawatts
and amend their standards to include the thermal load avoided by GHPs.
Utilities should be allowed to receive credit for Negawatts, and in turn
they should offer financial incentives for the installation of GHPs by
their customers.
The socioeconomic benefits of producing Negawatts are too
many to list here. Homeowners spend a majority of their energy costs to
heat, cool, and produce hot water. A GHP can significantly cut that
cost, and at the same time yield more disposable income. Innovative
dealer payment options and utility on-bill financing programs can
actually reduce monthly energy outlays while paying for GHP systems on
the installment plan.
The Kaiser Foundation (Tulsa, OK) financially supports the installation of a GHPs in Habitat for Humanity homes
in an effort to help break the cycle of poverty through energy
efficiency. The average energy cost for such homes is less than a dollar
a day. Both residential consumers and business owners alike can save
energy and increase their bottom lines by utilizing GHP technologies.
And unlike the conventional heating and air conditioning
industry, the GHP industry employs far more people than those working in
factories and installation. That includes a nationwide network of
drillers, drill rig equipment providers, and pipe and grout
manufacturing workers, to name a few. Negawatts generated by GHP
installations create thousands of jobs right here in the USA.
Our ability to use the earth for geothermal energy
exchange is limitless. The technology is waiting to be used, and it’s
proven to be the most energy efficient means to satisfy the thermal
loads of buildings. Their geothermal exchange of renewable energy from
the earth produces Negawatts, the cheapest units of energy produced and
consumed. We must forge new public policies that recognize this fact,
for the benefit of the environment, our economy, and the nation.
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/01/energy-efficiency-geothermal-heat-pumps-and-negawatts
No comments:
Post a Comment