A report
from the University of Georgia says that states can reduce their
greenhouse gas emissions by using a combination of renewable energy
sources and energy-saving strategies. It says those changes are
affordable if done properly. Marilyn
Brown, the project’s lead researcher and the Brook Byers Professor of
Sustainable Systems in the School of Public Policy at Georgia Tech tells
Think Progress,
“To minimize costs, the country needs to reduce its coal consumption
more rapidly, continue to expand its gas-fired power plants, but temper
this growth with aggressive policies to increase energy efficiency and
renewable energy.”
Complying with the Clean Power Plan would also produce substantial
collateral benefits such as lower electricity bills, greater GDP growth,
and significant reductions in SO2, NOx, and mercury emissions. “The
strong push on energy efficiency also enables GDP to rise above the
business-as-usual forecast,” said Brown. “The US increases its exports
and decreases its imports as a result of being more competitive.”
Another recent report by energy research firm Synapse Energy Economics finds
that average energy bills in 2030 could be $35 per month lower under a
“Clean Energy Future” scenario than they would be if the Clean Power
Plan is not put into operation. Both reports run counter to claims by utility advocates that the
Clean Power Plan will cause electric bills to skyrocket. Fear mongering
is a frequent tactic among so-called “think tanks” who think about what
their powerful and well-heeled benefactors tell them to think about. In
most cases, their conclusions are written before their studies even
begin.
“As energy is used more efficiently, non-competitive power plants can
be retired, construction of new coal plants can be deferred, and
transmission and distribution infrastructure investments can be delayed,
all of which would lower rates and therefore lower the energy bills of
all consumers,” Marilyn Brown said. “This is a counter-intuitive finding
to some who keep hearing from critics that have claimed that it will
significantly increase the electricity bills of American families.” For modeling purposes, the study’s researchers did detailed solar
cost analysis and determined that, by 2030, installed costs of solar
would be approximately $1.75/watt for utility-scale PV, $2/watt for
commercial-scale PV, and $2.50/watt for residential-scale PV in 2010
dollars.
Other recent studies show that, although residential solar may cost
more to install, its total cost is competitive with utility-scale
installations because it eliminates fixed costs for building
long-distance transmission lines, utility substations, and grid
infrastructure. It also eliminates the significant line losses that
plague electricity sent over long distances.
The University of Georgia report concludes with this statement:
“Energy efficiency programs and policies need to be revved up, along
with monitoring and verification schemes and energy bench marking.
States need to prepare for a future where solar energy plays a much
stronger role, both rooftop systems and solar farms, with a wide array
of different financing and ownership schemes.”
http://cleantechnica.com/2015/07/31/clean-power-plan-lower-electricity-bills/
No comments:
Post a Comment