Some businesses that back President Barack Obama’s plan to curb
greenhouse gases are making a late lobbying push to add an element
similar to a cap-and-trade program. With the administration set this week or next to unveil its final
rules to cut emissions from coal and natural gas plants, groups for
companies such as Johnson Controls Inc., Alstom SA and AES Corp. have
pressed officials to include a carbon market so that costs don’t surge.
Those programs — a slimmed-down version of a plan Congress debated and failed to pass early in Obama’s tenure — would apply to states that balk at putting rules in place. “It would reward states for what they are doing, whether they submit a
plan or not,” said Bob Wyman, a lawyer for the National Climate
Coalition, a group advocating to make the Environmental Protection
Agency’s rule workable. “It sets a national carbon price that can
unleash investment.”
The first U.S. rules on carbon emissions from power plants are among
the most sweeping and complex in the EPA’s history, promising to revamp
the way electricity has been generated and distributed for a century.
They are the centerpiece of Obama’s fight to combat climate change, the
issue he’s made a top priority of his final two years in the White
House.
Wyman’s group, on behalf of Alstom, AES, Boeing Co. and other
companies, and Advanced Energy Economy, which speaks for Johnson
Controls and First Solar Inc., met separately with White House officials
to pitch versions of trading programs
as the best way to get cuts. The plans are part of a wide-scale
advocacy campaign that is trying to shape the EPA’s carbon plan before
it’s finalized.
McConnell Vow
The EPA’s standards for fossil-fuel power plants, the top source of
the emissions blamed for global warming, has drawn fire from coal
producers, manufacturers, state officials and Republicans, led by Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. He has urged governors to
refuse to submit plans to meet the goals set out by the EPA.
The agency now is grappling with specific criticisms of its proposal,
which was released last year. The objections include how it tried to
give a boost to existing nuclear plants, the amount of natural-gas
generation it assumed will be available by 2020 and the wide
discrepancies in cuts mandated from one state to another.
Rural electric cooperatives in Florida and Arizona also met with
White House officials recently. They say the EPA’s rules could force
them to shut coal plants after investing million of dollars to meet
other federal pollution rules. Unlike large utilities such as Southern
Co., they said they don’t have the ability to switch among many
different plants.
Arizona Cuts
Only two of Arizona’s coal plants are likely to survive if the EPA’s
plans is unchanged from the proposal, according to the National Rural
Electric Cooperative Association. Arizona would have to make the
second-steepest cut in the country, at 52 percent, under the proposals. “We don’t have the transmission resources to replace our coal fleet,”
said Patrick Ledger, chief executive of Arizona Electric Generation and
Transmission Cooperatives. “We tried to reach out to the administration
in every way possible, but we don’t have any idea if they really
listened to us.”
Ledger said that to avoid a mandate under a separate EPA regional
haze rule, his cooperative agreed to curb pollution at one coal unit and
switch another to run on natural gas. Now, under the EPA’s carbon
rules, the coal unit may be forced to close — and default on a federal
loan.
Debt Jeopardy
“I have $200 million in outstanding debt on this plant, and I can’t
make it go away,” he said. Ledger said that when he met with EPA chief
Gina McCarthy to press his case, she assured him the agency would
address his state’s issue. The agency also has vowed to address how to deal with states that
don’t come up with adequate plans. McCarthy said the agency will release
a federal implementation proposal at the same time it finalizes the
power-plant rule.
Lawyers say that EPA cannot rework a state’s entire electricity
system, and so must set standards plant by plant. The only way to do
that, and not cause widespread problems for coal plants, is to allow
trading, advocates say.
Unlike the economy-wide cap-and-trade system considered in Congress,
these plans would only apply to the electricity sector and would likely
entail a reduction in the emissions rate, not an absolute cap.
“If EPA takes this approach, there is no substantive or policy
downside for power plants in states that do not develop their own
plans,” said Arvin Ganesan, vice president for federal policy at
Advanced Energy Economy in Washington. “In fact, it would result in cheaper compliance cost for utilities and end consumers.”
©2015 Bloomberg News
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2015/07/us-clean-power-plan-could-include-carbon-trading.html
No comments:
Post a Comment