Hydropower
is a mature technology that has tapped most of the resources available
in developed countries, with the exception of Canada, which continues to
eye large hydro projects. Despite this, there are still hydro
opportunities available in the United States.
An estimated $4 billion
worth of orders were made over the past four years, mostly to repower
and/or upgrade aging hydroelectric plants, develop small projects, and
create energy storage (pumped hydro), totaling 618 MW of installed
capacity.
Globally, the picture is quite different. Developing
countries such as China, Russia, Laos, Chile and Peru continue the
development of new large hydroelectric plants. Orders for these new
developments accounted for roughly 85.4 GW of new capacity in the past
four years, representing $550.1 billion in revenue.
Just in 2014,
China commissioned nine projects of over 2GW in capacity – including
portions of the Xiluodu hydro project, the third largest hydro plant in
the world, with approximately 12.6 GW of capacity from 18 turbines of
700 MW each. Russia also finished the works in its Buguchany Dam on the
Angara River, toward the border with Mongolia. The plant has a capacity
of almost 3 GW and was built at a cost of $2.6 billion. Additional
projects in Asia are Laos’s Xe Pian–Xe Namnoy with 410 MW capacity worth
$1 billion and the 290 MW Nam Ngiep 1 project worth $643 million.
In
Latin America, Chile, Peru and Costa Rica developed the largest
hydropower projects. Chile took the lead with a $2 billion investment in
its 531 MW Alto Maipo run-of-the-river plant, which is now under
construction, followed by Costa Rica’s Reventazon plant, which involved
an investment of almost $1.4 billion to develop 305 MW of capacity. Peru
has two projects with a similar capacity. The Chaglla plant on the
Huallaga River in Peru cost $1.2 billion and has a capacity of 462 MW
while the Cerro del Aquila plant’s 500 MW capacity will need only $900
million of investment by the time it is finished in mid-2015.
The
cost per megawatt of installed capacity varies widely depending on the
difficulty of the project, the technology used, and the social and
environmental mitigation costs. For example, the Alto Maipo
run-of-the-river plant cost $3.9 million/MW to develop while super
large-scale dams in China such as the Xiluodu Hydropower plant, were
reported in 2003, when construction started, as low as $0.6 million per
MW ($0.8 million/MW of today’s dollars) – though Navigant estimates the
true cost, including resettlement, cost overruns, and other non-included
costs to push the final price tag significantly higher. All hydropower
projects are unique. For example, the Xiluodu hydropower plant in China
is almost 30 times larger than Alto Maipo and is using conventional
turbines, while the Chilean project involves the construction of 67
kilometers (42 miles) of tunnels in the Andean range at deeps of up to
1,700 meters (5,580 feet) and is using more expensive run-of-the-river
technology. A Navigant study of hydropower projects found a range in
installed costs of $1 million to $6 million per MW.
Hydropower
projects often face strong public opposition due to the impact on local
communities, ecosystems, and cost overruns – but remain the largest
source of renewable energy in the world. Furthermore, due to its large
reservoirs, hydro represents the largest and most cost-effective form of
energy storage, able to meet demand as it fluctuates.
Companies
such as Siemens, Alstom, and Voith are targeting developing countries
where future growth is expected, including in Africa, which is home to
six of the 10 fastest growing economies globally. Notably the Grand Inga
hydropower project in the Democratic Republic of Congo could be the
world’s largest hydropower project with potential capacity of
approximately 40 GW, larger than China’s massive Three Gorges Dam.
http://theenergycollective.com/coley-girouard/2222041/advanced-energy-now-new-hydropower-developing-markets-upgrades-united-states
No comments:
Post a Comment