Another tumultuous volatility ridden fortnight has seen oil
benchmarks go backwards and forwards, gaining and shedding couple of
dollars, not just a few cents, on a near daily basis. We are firmly stuck in the $40-50 per barrel bracket for now and in
this jumpy market every minor dataset triggers rapid fluctuations
testing logical support and resistance levels, as traders attempt to
find direction.
There is no doubting the third quarter of 2015 is likely
to see the worst average quarterly Brent price since 2010, beating the
first quarter’s average price by some distance (see below). Furthermore, plummeting oil prices will cause cash flow for the
global integrated oil and gas industry to contract by 20% or more for
2015, with only a modest recovery expected in 2016, according to
Moody’s. It reflects the ratings agency’s expectation of continued
revenue declines and a negative free cash flow profile for the industry
in 2015.
Overall, Moody’s outlook for the global integrated oil and gas industry will remain negative well into 2016. How low margin oil producers
perform next year, as their existing hedging plans start rolling off,
will go a long way towards deciding the direction of the market.
Of course, there are logical reasons to believe a supply correction
is around the corner, but it would be painfully slow. The market
correction this time around would be quite unlike anything the sector
has had to contend with in recent memory, because there are in effect
“two parallel cycles” in the oil market, according to a noted economist
at Abu Dhabi’s oil revenue powered sovereign wealth fund.
Christof Ruhl, head of research at Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), told delegates at the recent Gulf Intelligence Energy Markets Forum in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, that the first cycle is the routine conventional oil story where the effects of ongoing capital expenditure cuts would only be felt 7 to 10 years from now.
“And then you have unconventional US shale where the response to
ramping production up or down would be quicker and short-run focused.” Ruhl said the production pattern of shale oil
is very different from conventional oil. “In a classic sense, it is not
subject to a 7 to 10 year response [for better or worse] to investment
increases or capital expenditure reduction that conventional oil plays
remain susceptible to.”
The ADIA economist who joined the sovereign wealth fund from BP in
May 2014, predicted in 2012 in his capacity as the oil major’s Chief
Economist that the boom in US shale gas and unconventional oil would
make North America almost totally self-sufficient in energy within 20
years, a theory that still rings true in turbulent times.
“That’s because shale oil supply is simply more elastic and
responsive to prevalent market conditions, almost in a cyclical world of
its own,” Ruhl opined. He also felt when oil prices started declining
in the face of incremental supplies from July 2014 onwards, it was only
rational for OPEC not to cut production in order to maintain its market share in strategic Asian markets. However, shale has shown tremendous resilience, and neither US nor
Canadian production has suffered to the extent market forecasters
thought it would because technology had been a great equalizer.
“Despite, the North American rig count falling, technological
improvements have exceeded expectations to keep production steady if not
in a state of constant increase,” he concluded. The dual cycle logic does ring true, and looks to be vexing OPEC. In
one sense, its stance of maintaining production levels in order to
maintain market share has paid off. However, conventional production is
feeling the heat more, cutting more aggressively and can’t turn things
around in the event of an uptick as quickly as plucky shale independents
operating in Eagle Ford, Texas can.
Ruhl said OPEC’s response
from here is among the biggest uncertainties the market faces.
“Nigeria, and Venezuela even more so, need the price to rise and would
always vote for a headline production cut by OPEC members. However,
paradoxically given their dire finances when times are desperate – in
sheer economic terms they can do little more than pump as much oil as
they can in order to monetize it.”
In theory, an extraordinary OPEC meeting can take place at three
weeks’ notice or even less if the situation demands. However, having
covered OPEC for nearly 10 years, I see few signs of there being one on
the cards, despite mumblings from the likes of Venezuela in favor of one
well before the scheduled summit in December.
Speaking at the same forum as Ruhl, Nawal Al Fezai, OPEC Governor for
Kuwait, did little to raise hopes for an unscheduled summit. “All I can
say is that in volatile times such as these, OPEC would be patient.” Al Fezai admitted OPEC depended on China to a great extent as one of
its partners. “But, I think fears about a slump in Chinese oil demand
are exaggerated, and I don’t see it falling to the extent that it did in
Europe [or OECD markets] in wake of the 2008-09 global financial
crisis.”
With China’s economy in transition, the riddle of Iraqi production, possibility of additional Iranian barrels
coming on to the market, US shale rotating in it is own elastic cycle
of ups and downs (should Ruhl be believed), are the known unknowns bound
to complicate matters furthers in a market already struggling to find a
floor.
Simply put, suffering or success of plucky US shale players is a tad
different from the rest of industry and for better or worse won’t be on
the same page as the ups and downs of conventional production. Shale
might suffer but also has the capacity to bounce back sooner too.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/gauravsharma/2015/09/24/conventional-vs-unconventional-oil-market-grappling-with-two-internal-cycles/2/
No comments:
Post a Comment