As it attempts to reap the benefits of easing international sanctions, Iran is wooing western oil companies in hopes of luring them back to the country. The potential suitors on Iran’s list include Shell, Exxon Mobil XOM -1.95%, ConocoPhillips COP -1.22%, and BP BP -1.1%.
Its end game, though, may have more to do with intra-OPEC politics than
with capitalizing on Western investment and technology.
BP, in particular, has a long history in Iran. Its origins as a
company are rooted there. William Knox D’Arcy, the founder of what
became BP, secured almost a half-million acres in what was then Persia
in the early 1900s, which led to the creation of the Anglo-Persian Oil
Co. Persia became Iran in 1935, and it remained BP’s primary source of
oil into the 1950s. The terms of D’Arcy’s leases, though, left the
country with little revenue from the oil being produced, which led to
the government’s seizure of its assets in 1951.
U.S. and British intelligence agencies, worried that Iran’s new
regime was becoming aligned with Soviet Russia, arranged the overthrow
of the prime minister and installed a pro-West shah as head of the
government. The shah quickly restored BP’s Iranian assets, but they were
seized again in the 1979 revolution.
Clearly, by opening its arms once again to Western investment, the
Iranian government has two goals in mind. One, BP and Shell in
particular are on its list of companies it claims still owe debts that
predate the ’79 revolution. While Iran hasn’t put an amount on these
debts, Shell has estimated its tab at $2.3 billion.
In other words, the ante is going to be high, and for BP, which has
been selling assets to pay tens of billions in claims related to the
Deepwater Horizon disaster, the hefty price for returning to its roots
comes at a bad time. The upside, of course, is that it knows the
reserves as well as any company, and perhaps as well as the Iranians.
Collecting on its debt claims after decades of economic sanctions
would be a nice windfall for Tehran, as would ongoing capital investment
and the technology that would come with it. Iran’s production has
stagnated for much of the past decade, and the economic sanctions
imposed over its nuclear program left it cut off from new drilling
technology that could boost production.
But there’s another game afoot here. In recent years, the Iranians have been challenging the Saudis for control of OPEC. For the past several years, the Iranians and other OPEC such as Venezuela have been pressuring the Saudis to limit production and drive up crude prices. The Saudis, the only OPEC member with excess capacity, have resisted.
Make no mistake, the rise of U.S. oil production has put pressure on Iran,
forcing it to accept the nuclear deal reached with the U.S. last year.
The U.S. oil boom has kept global crude prices stable, which has hurt
Iran as its economic problems mounted. But the U.S. energy renaissance
is reshaping power in petro-politics, and Iran may see an opportunity to
press its hand within OPEC and settle some old scores.
The flirting with western companies has made the Saudis uneasy, but
the kingdom no longer has the grip on world oil prices that it once did.
As U.S. production rises – the International Energy
Agency estimates U.S. oil production may rival Saudi’s as early as next
year – the Saudi’s are losing leverage with their best customer. With the easing of sanctions, Iran isn’t jus trying to reassert
itself on the world stage, it may be angling for a starring role.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/lorensteffy/2014/01/30/why-iran-is-courting-bp-and-exxonmobil/?ss=business%3Aenergy
No comments:
Post a Comment