Want to increase the use of green energy and reduce the level of
harmful emissions? Invest heavily in the grid to both modernize and
expand it, which will accomplish such aims while also building the US
economy. That’s the view of energy and utility experts assembled by Public Utilities Fortnightly at
its energy, money and power conference last week in Washington, DC. A
smarter and more extensive grid that is able to distribute greener power
is expensive. But the benefits of creating a modern infrastructure are
huge.
“This vision is also about job creation and economic benefits,”
says Massoud Amin, chairman of the IEEE Smart Grid and a professor of
electrical engineering at the University of Minnesota. For every $1
invested in the nation’s network, as much as $6 is returned, not to
mention the 47,000 new jobs since 2012.
Just ask CenterPoint Energy Inc. and DTE Energy Co., which have
invested hundreds of millions of dollars (with some federal help) to
improve performance over their wires. Those who run electricity systems
can now apply algorithms to tell operators which units to run and where
to avoid congestion on the lines, all of which favors wind and solar
energy that is variable in nature.
EPB technicians connect high-voltage
electric wires on Tuesday, April 24, 2012, in Chattanooga, Tenn., to the
S&C IntelliRupter Pulsecloser, a smart switch that will help EPB
reduce power outage durations by 40 percent.EPB technicians connect
high-voltage electric wires on Tuesday, April 24, 2012, in Chattanooga,
Tenn., to the S&C IntelliRupter Pulsecloser, a smart switch that
will help EPB reduce power outage durations by 40 percent. (Christopher
Berkey/AP Images for S&C Electric Company)
Today, the bulk power system — as it is known — is comprised of
10,000 power plants, 170,000 miles of high-voltage transmission lines
and nearly 6 million miles of low-voltage distribution lines. It also
has more than 15,000 substations.
The pressure to increase the use of renewables will only intensify,
in part because of EPA’s proposed Clean Power Plan to reduce carbon
dioxide emissions by 30 percent by 2030. As such, the proposal will
require more centrally-generated wind and solar energy that need access
to the transmission lines. Professor Amin says that if wind energy is to
swell by 40 percent during this time, high-voltage, long distance
transmission will need to enlarge by 9 percent.
To that end, the PJM Interconnection that manages the transmission
grid over 13-states in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions says that it
has approved hundreds of upgrades and additions that will entail $24
billion of new capital in the coming years. Specifically, 10 of its 13
states have renewable portfolio standards that will require more green
energy. With that, it sees 19,700 megawatts of wind going up before 2020
that will also demand investments in energy storage that can harness
the power and then inject it later on to the grid.
“Expansion is happening,” says Terry Boston, chief executive of PJM.
“The planning process is not broken. But the siting process is time
consuming.” “It won’t get much easier to site transmission,” adds Philip Moeller,
commissioner at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). “You
can’t just snap your fingers. Congress “needs to restore FERC’s backstop
authority,” which it was given in 2005 as a way to facilitate much-need
transmission projects if the states refused to act. But the courts
later clarified the law to say that FERC cannot override the states if
they decline to permit a project.
The American Wind Energy Association says
that up to 60,000 megawatts of new wind energy development is possible
if planned transmission expansions actually occur. In Texas, for
example, it says that wind is generated in rural sections and
transported to population centers, allowing the transmission operator
known as ERCOT to nearly double its use of wind energy. There, nearly
$15 billion has been invested to generate about 19,500 megawatts of wind
energy.
Meantime, it says that transmission operators in the Midwest and the
Southwest are enacting similar policies. The Mid-continent Independent
System Operator is integrating 14,000 megawatts of new wind while the
Southwest Power Pool is doing the same with 3,000 new megawatts there.
But what about solar energy? The Obama administration’s Clean Power
Plan could also boost that industry, says Julia Hamm, chief executive of
the Solar Electric Power Association. The recent past has seen such
mega-deals as the 392-megawatt concentrated solar plant called Ivanpah, which is joint venture among NRG Energy, Google and Brightsource Energy.
That project takes 173,000 mirrors and focuses the sunlight to the
plant’s solar receiver steam generator, when then produces electricity.
However, it’s costly and out-of-favor, given that it is much easier and
much less expensive to put rooftop solar panels on homes and businesses —
not to mention the headaches of trying to get new transmission built to
carry the power to where it would be consumed.
That’s why Hamm says that the trend now is to build smaller
utility-scale projects that may total 30 megawatts. Some of the biggest
names in the solar industry are headed this way, she adds, pointing to
First Solar Inc. and SunPower Corp.
“They can do it on the distribution side, not on the transmission
side,” she says, who adds that “community solar” is also becoming a
viable option: It permits consumers to buy into a larger project that it
is taking place in a jurisdiction, which can also avoid high-voltage
interfaces as well as the cross-subsidization battles now occurring
between rooftop solar customers and their electric utilities.
The existing grid is becoming better and smarter, allowing for more
efficient and cleaner transportation of energy. But network expansion
will also be necessary, not just to accommodate a growing economy but
also to satisfy pending clean air rules. Roadblocks persist. But it is
an effort and an investment that will pay off both environmentally and
economically.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kensilverstein/2015/04/13/want-more-wind-and-solar-energy-invest-a-lot-more-in-the-grid/2/?ss=energy
No comments:
Post a Comment