New Hampshire, USA --
Are we seeing deja-vu in today's concentrated solar photovoltaic
(CPV) market from the 2007-2008 period of solar PV? That's what one
analyst says, offering as evidence wide technology advancements, a
ramp-up in demand, and rapidly decreasing cost projections.
The PV market in 2007 and early 2008 was shaped by heavy technology
development, and a lot of uncertainty as companies struggled to become
"bankable" and get financing, explained Karl Melkonyan, solar PV analyst
for IHS out of Germany. Even then, though, there were leaders in PV
manufacturing, and in regional deployments — and then in 2008 the
industry saw a "breakthrough" as demand surged and prices plummeted, he
explained.
Similarly, CPV technology is comparably pushing forward very rapidly
as PV did back then: in just the past few months we've seen recent
records in cells (Soitec, Solar Junction) and modules (Semprius, Amonix).
Improvements are also being made in the system optics (lenses),
reducing the impact of higher temperatures from concentration, reducing
transmissions through the system from the modules to the cabling, and
optimizing the trackers.
In terms of uncertainty, we've seen that in the CPV market, not
unlike solar PV in the late 2000s: SolFocus closed its doors this fall, GreenVolts lost ABB funding, Amonix closed its Las Vegas plant, Suncore acquired Zenith Solar, and Soitec closed a German plant
to consolidate at its newer and larger San Diego facility. To achieve
"bankable" status CPV companies are judged based on investors'
confidence in their longevity of operation and installation of products
and projects, Melkonyan said, and having insurance or a performance
warranty helps too. (Note this fall Soitec began offering performance/warranty insurance for its CPV modules through Germany's Munich RE.)
CPV's Demand Trajectory
Demand for CPV by itself is lower than it was for PV in the late
2000s, of course. IHS sees CPV installations soaring over the next few
years, from just 160 MW in 2013 to more than 1.3 GW in 2020, and more
than doubling every year. More than half of projects assigned that
account for IHS' 2014 and 2015 installation numbers, according to
Melkonyan. Five vendors (Soitec, Suncore, Silex, Semprius, and Amonix)
each will have hundreds of megawatts of installations by the end of
2015, he says, with a growing crop of startups and midsize firms coming
on fast: MagPower, Morgan Solar, CSDR, SunPower, and Solaria, among
others.
Global CPV system installation forecast. Credit: IHS
In the near-term there's still plenty of activity in CPV, though. Soitec is expanding into multi-megawatt CPV plants in South Africa and China, and has been busy with smaller pilot projects in Portugal, Saudi Arabia, and the U.S.. Suncor is working on its own similarly sized project. And SunPower is part of Apple's plans for a 18-20-MW CPV plant for its data center in Reno, Nevada.
CPV's installed cost-per-watt is rapidly decreasing thanks to
improvements in system efficiencies and the economics of scaling up to
volume business: Melkonyan says they'll decrease nearly 26 percent this
year alone to $2.62/W, and are on a track for 15 percent annual
reductions through 2017 to $1.59/W. That 2013 cost/W number is a global
weighted average, Melkonyan points out; in China the lowest HCPV system
cost will be $2.38/W, and prices are declining fast in South Africa and
Middle East regions, with "hundreds of cumulative installations" by
2017, he noted. Those are CPV's sweetspot target markets: hot, dry
climates with high direct normal irradiation (DNI greater than 6 kWh/m2).
Those cost/W numbers are admittedly higher than for PV — but CPV
proponents have long argued to broaden the discussion to the levelized
cost of electricity (LCOE), from generating electricity when it's
connected and stretched to include total lifetime energy production and
systems costs — and in those key high-DNI regions the calculations point
to CPV success. By the LCOE metric, CPV's average LCOE is declining
nearly 23 percent this year to $0.14/kWh and should decline another 12
percent annually until 2017, Melkonyan said. (Some back-of-napkin math
puts that 2017 LCOE at around $0.08/W.)
Russ Kanjorski, VP of business development at Semprius, calls the IHS
cost/W projections "realistic," and underscores that CPV "has the most
headroom for efficiency improvement and system-level cost reduction over
the next 10 years" — at least, he added, for the most competitive CPV
variants. Amonix CEO Pat McCullough said he thinks IHS' pipeline and
cost projections might even be on the low side.
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/12/cpv-outlook-demand-doubling-costs-halved-by-2017
No comments:
Post a Comment