BERLIN --
What’s a beleaguered utility to do when forced by the government to close its profitable nuclear power plants? It turns to lignite, a cheap, soft, muddy-brown colored form of
sedimentary rock that spews more greenhouse gases than any other fossil
fuel.
The story of German power giant RWE AG exemplifies the
crisis facing the nation’s utility industry — and those of many
countries across Europe — as nuclear power plants get shuttered in the
wake of the Fukushima disaster, renewables steal away revenue, and
consumers and companies complain about rising power costs that are three
times higher than in the U.S.
Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision in 2011 to shutter
all 17 of Germany’s nuclear power stations by 2022 struck a blow to
RWE’s profit stream, particularly for a company that has almost no
presence in renewables. RWE posted its first loss last year since World
War II and may face worse losses going forward.
The Essen-based company, founded in 1898 to produce
power for Germany’s industrial heartland, has had no choice except to
ramp up production from its profitable coal-fired plants, most of which
burn lignite.
The result: RWE now generates 52 percent of its power
in Germany from lignite, up from 45 percent in 2011. And RWE isn’t
alone. Utilities all over Germany have ramped up coal use as the nation
has watched the mix of coal-generated electricity rise to 45 percent
last year, the highest level since 2007.
Difficult Task
Peter Terium, chief executive officer of the utility’s executive
board, “has one of the most difficult tasks in RWE’s history,” said
Ernst Gerlach, director of Verband der kommunalen RWE-Aktionaere GmbH, a
municipal investor association that represents 23 percent of RWE’s
shareholders. Terium will address investors at the company’s annual
general meeting this week.
RWE rose 0.9 percent to 28.87 euros in Germany today, trading at 28.79 euros at 2:23 p.m. local time. RWE’s plight frames a larger story of how coal
— thought to be doomed as the continent attempts a shift toward a
fossil-fuel free future — is rising in Germany and across Europe as
countries seek to re-balance their green ambitions with economic
reality.
Many of Europe’s largest utilities are caught between a
weak economy that undermines power demand and policies that favor wind
and solar energy over traditional power plants. Usually a safe haven for
investors in troubled economic times, Europe’s utility stocks have
fallen 12 percent over the past five years, as the wider stock market
has gained 60 percent.
Lignite Shift
“The energy shift threatens to become a lignite shift,” said Oliver
Krischer, a senior Green Party member of parliament. Utilities should
invest in renewable energy rather than pursuing an “obsolete business
model.”
Annett Urbaczka, an RWE spokeswoman, said the turn to
lignite had been forced on the company because it’s the only fuel that
can compete given the preference awarded to renewables under Germany’s
market rules.
However, many are convinced that there are too many
forces pushing against coal for its comeback to last. Europe can’t
afford to keep coal-fired plants going and meet stringent targets to
reduce carbon-dioxide emissions.
Germany’s environment minister has proposed reducing
the number of carbon emission permits in Europe to increase the cost of
burning coal. Last month, the government in RWE’s home state of North
Rhine-Westphalia moved to limit digging at a lignite mine owned by the
company.
“RWE can’t rely on conditions for lignite not to
deteriorate politically,” Michael Vassiliadis, president of IG BCE, a
union that represents thousands of RWE workers, said in an interview.
“Almost all activities come with political risks attached.”
Coal Generation
RWE’s largest competitor, EON SE, has fared somewhat better. It runs a
large international business producing power in emerging markets,
including Turkey and Brazil, that’s provided some protection from the
German power market, where electricity prices hit a record low this
month. Even so, the Dusseldorf-based company increased coal generation
in Germany last year as it cut profit forecasts.
“Due to the higher dependence from electricity
generation in Germany, RWE is more vulnerable than EON,” said Thomas
Deser, a portfolio manager at Union Investment, who is responsible for
the fund’s stake in RWE.
Terium’s room for maneuvering “is currently very
limited,” he said in an interview in Frankfurt. “It’s a matter of
reducing costs, disinvesting. That’s a rearguard action aimed to ensure
the financial viability.”
Late To Invest in Renewables
One of RWE’s chief handicaps has been its lack of
clout of in the renewable energy market where subsidies and preferential
access to the grid have increased the market share in Germany to a
record 24 percent last year. “We were late entering into the renewables
market — possibly too late,” Terium told reporters at his annual press
conference last month, saying the company had “made mistakes.”
Last year, RWE generated 6.4 percent of its power from alternative energy sources, compared with almost double that at EON.
Longer-term, RWE plans to invest more in local
distribution grids, renewable plants and its retail business. Terium has
also sold assets, including oil and natural gas business Dea, to
bolster the company’s balance sheet and reduce the amount needed to
invest in existing businesses.
Still, RWE has no plans to back away from lignite. The
company is pressing ahead with plans to build a 1,100-megawatt plant at
Niederaussem, near Germany’s border with Belgium. Planned to start
operation in 2018, if it gets the final go-ahead it will cost
cash-strapped RWE 1.5 billion euros ($2.1 billion) to build.
It’s not a strategy that convinces RWE’s work force,
which has shrunk by 30,000 since 1998, said Hans Peter Lafos, a trade
union representative and RWE supervisory board member. He blames both
management and politician’s for the company’s predicament. “The staff’s hope that anything turns around for the better has gone,” he said.
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2014/04/ceo-of-german-utility-rwe-says-it-should-have-invested-in-renewable-energy-sooner
No comments:
Post a Comment