The 2014 Annual Report of the AAPG Energy Minerals Division Committee (Michael D. Campbell, Chair) just came out and its findings are quite interesting (EMD Uranium 2014).
It’s a good read if you want to know the state of uranium in the world,
but also covers a lot of material on all energy fronts. I have taken
freely from it for this post. Full disclosure – I am on the Advisory
Group to this committee.
Energy minerals focus on ores of uranium,
thorium and helium-3 as materials useful for fission and fusion
reactors. But rare earth elements (REE) and other energy-important or
high-tech materials are also included (see figure below). Although coal
is the most developed of all energy minerals, it has its own category
and is not included in EMD analyses. Oil and gas are not minerals as
they do not have a defined three-dimensional arrangement of their atoms
in space, the definition of a mineral.
The common wisdom, that limited uranium supplies will prevent a
substantial increase in nuclear energy, is incorrect. We have plenty of
uranium, enough for the next 10,000 years. But uranium supplies are
governed by the same market forces as any other commodity, and
projections only include what is cost-effective today. Like natural gas,
unconventional sources of uranium abound.
The energy stage for this report was set by the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s International Energy Outlook 2013 projections
that global energy use between 2010 and 2040 will grow by 56%, from 524
quadrillion British thermal units (Btu) to 820 quadrillion Btu (EIA today).
Most of this growth will come from outside the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development, in non-OECD countries (the
developing world) where demand is driven by steadily-increasing economic
growth (OECD).
In general, the outlook for significant changes to the world’s energy
mix is not good, and business-as-usual appears to be winning over
significant change towards alternative energy sources. Global
energy-related CO2 emissions are projected to increase by 46% to 45
billion metric tons in 2040. Fossil FOSL -0.62%-fueled economic growth in developing nations accounts for most of the increased emissions. Actions taken by the U.S. and Europe will have little effect on global output.
Nuclear is still increasing by 2.5% per year globally, but
renewables, including hydro, are now the fastest-growing power
generation sector, growing at about 4% per year, and will make up almost
a quarter of the global power mix by 2018, up from an estimated 20% in
2011. Non-hydro renewables are projected to increase by about 10% per
year in the next several years almost doubling in the seven years, from
4% of global total power production in 2011 to almost 8% in 2018 (IEA).
However, fossil fuels will continue to supply over 70% of world
energy use (power plus transportation) through 2040 unless China and
India continue their recent interest in new nuclear power plant
construction in place of coal plants. Natural gas is the fastest-growing
fossil fuel, as global supplies of gas from tight sands, gas from
shale, and coalbed methane increase.
Natural gas is the fastest-growing fossil fuel, as global supplies from tight sands, gas shales, and coalbed methane increase (EIA detail). Coal is expected to decrease as a source of power generation as natural gas, nuclear, and renewable energy increase. Industry continues to use the largest share of delivered energy
produced, and projections indicate it will consume more than 50% of
global delivered energy in 2040.
While the report focuses on the status of the
uranium industry, other industries are discussed.
Following is a list of
the Committee’s key findings concerning energy minerals with a rather
complete discussion of uranium resources.
• Japan will most likely re-start many of their nuclear reactors with
improved safety factors over the next few years because Japan has no
realistic alternatives. They will remain the third-largest user of
uranium in the world.
• The current status of U.S. reactors include
100 reactors in full operation, 5 under construction, 25 in the
planning/permitting stage, and 32 in permanent shut-down or retirement.
• China has 20 operating nuclear power plants (only 1% of their total
power produced), another 28 under construction, and has brought 3
nuclear plants on-line in 2013. An additional 50 nuclear plants are in
the various stages of planning and permitting.
• 2013 U.S. uranium production increased by 16% over that of 2012,
the highest production since 1997. At present, 83% of U.S. nuclear fuel
demand is met by foreign sources, such as Canada, Australia, and
Kazakhstan.
• Uranium spot prices will likely remain around
$35/lb for yellowcake (U3O8). However, upward cost pressure is growing
because of future demands from China, Japan, and new construction.
• China is considering the use of thorium technology in their
nuclear-reactor designs to reduce their growing need for uranium.
Thorium is under serious study to replace uranium in reactors via Thor
Energy and a consortium involving Westinghouse and others.
• Canada continues to produce world-class uranium deposits in the
Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan with record high uranium grades
above 20% U3O8. Cameco CCJ -0.82%’s
Cigar Lake deposit in Athabasca Basin is expected to produce 18 million
pounds of U3O8 by 2018 or about 9% of the world’s uranium supply per
year. Cameco also owns and operates the McArthur River Mine in the
Athabasca Basin, which produces about 13% of the world’s supply.
• Australia’s Olympic Dam uranium mine is owned by BHP Billiton BHP -0.18%
and produces about 6% of the world’s supply. Australia’s Ranger uranium
mine is owned by Energy Resources of Australia produces about 5% of the
world’s yearly uranium supply. Other uranium mines in Australia also
rank high in production, such as the Beverly and Honeymoon Mines, with
the Four-Mile Mine nearing production. In Western Australia, Cauldron
Energy is having success with its metallurgical testing of its Bennet
Well deposit and is preparing for production in the hopes of increases
in U3O8 prices.
• Giant uranium producer, Rio Tinto RIO -1.03%,
is having environmental problems with leaching-tank leaks at both the
Ranger Mine in the Northern Territory of Australia and at its Rossing
Mine in Namibia (SW Africa).
• Kazakhstan mines produce about 36% of the world’s yearly uranium supply, most of which go to Russia and China.
• Argentina has a number of uranium deposits under development to
fuel their two existing nuclear reactors, with a third reactor coming
on-line in 2014.
• Greenland’s Kvanefjeld deposit in the Ilimaussac Complex located in
Southern Greendland is under development by Greenland Minerals &
Energy, Inc. and contains significant uranium, rare earths, and zinc.
The local and national governments are supporting the project.
• Mongolia has substantial uranium resources.
Russia mined these deposits to 1995, and then resumed in 2008. Russia is
negotiating to develop other deposits in the area but is having issues
with the political risks involved within the government. Mongolia is
attempting to improve its nuclear mining regulations and laws.
• In Africa, Gabon, Mauritania, and Zambia have emerged with viable
uranium resources; but doing business in such remote regions are
challenging both financially and geopolitically. Some mines in Africa
are closing in response to these difficulties.
• Tanzania has a number of developing uranium deposits. The East
African Resources, Inc. (EAR) has arranged financing to fund further
exploration on its Mabada deposit. Other deposits are under development
by EAR with a South Korean group and by a Russian group (Uranium One).
• India is looking to Central Asia to meet its uranium needs, such as
Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia, as well as Australia.
• Reports have surfaced that China now controls the market on up to
15 strategic minerals including REEs and graphite, while Russia exerts
major control on palladium, platinum group metals, and nickel, as well
as uranium via Kazakhstan.
• The U.S. DOE has identified five elements of the REE group as the
most critical to U.S. industry: dysprosium, neodymium, terbium,
europium, and yttrium. These elements are key components for high-tech
magnets, lasers, semiconductors, lamps and special glass. Concerns are
that China may be only able to produce enough heavy REEs to supply its
own needs leaving the world with an inadequate supply.
• To counter this problem, the State of Alaska is helping to fund a
rare-earth mine, Ucore Rare Metals, Inc. In Canada, the government is
considering providing funds to secure REE supplies via Pele Mountain
Resources, Inc. In Europe, Tasman Metals, Ltd. could become a dedicated
supplier of REEs to the European Union.
• Ocean-Floor Mining permits by the United
Nations continue to increase in the Pacific, Mid-Atlantic, and Indian
Oceans. Ocean-Floor Resources may contain more than 27 billion tons of
nodules consisting of over 290 million tons of copper, 340 million tons
of nickel, and very large reserves of REEs. The environmental challenges
will be different than for mining on land, but should be better since
removal of material will be minimal compared to land mining and no
processing will occur within the ocean.
It appears from this report that sufficient mineral resources exist
to support significant growth in nuclear and renewable energy, and
high-tech industries, but that fossil fuels will continue to dominate
the world’s energy supply. If we want to change this future, we will have to change the developing world more than our own.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2014/04/07/fossil-fuels-still-rule-but-dont-worry-we-have-plenty-of-uranium/?ss=energy
No comments:
Post a Comment